Skip to content
HempScale

Instagram for CBD gummies and edibles brands

Gummies are the easiest hemp product to photograph and the most heavily constrained to write about. Everything that makes them sell in a shop, that they look like sweets, is exactly what makes a post a problem: the appeal to people who should not have them is the thing regulators look for first.

Updated 3 minute read

The sweet framing is the trap

A bowl of coloured gummies on a pastel background is the default shot in this category, and it is the shot that reads as confectionery. Once a hemp product is presented as a treat, the questions that follow are about who it appeals to, and none of the answers are good.

The alternative is not a duller photograph. It is a photograph with the pack in it, so the frame says product rather than sweets.

The wording edibles carry

Edible forms trigger requirements that oils and topicals do not. A child could take one, so the child safety line applies; a serving is countable, so intake wording applies the moment a number appears.

  • Keep out of reach of children, wherever the product is something a child could eat.
  • The daily serving line in the EU whenever a number of gummies is mentioned.
  • The FSA intake figure in the UK whenever a serving is mentioned.
  • Age marker, as with any hemp product.

The exact sentences per market are in the European Union guide and the United Kingdom guide.

Do not write this

Two gummies a day keeps the stress away

Write this instead

Twelve gummies a jar, 10 milligrams each, pectin based and vegan. Batch report in our highlights.

Why. A serving, a frequency and an outcome, in a rhyme that makes it memorable. The rhyme is the aggravating factor: it is the format that appeals to people who are not the audience.

What to post instead

  • Ingredients, properly. Pectin or gelatine, what the colour comes from, whether there is added sugar.
  • The making of the batch. Edibles have the most interesting production process in the category and almost nobody films it.
  • Flavour, which is a legitimate subject with no claim in it anywhere.
  • Storage. Heat, sunlight and shelf life are real questions and honest content.
  • Serving size as a fact about the product, in the same breath as the required notice, rather than as advice.
Anything that makes the product look like a children's snack is a problem whether or not the caption says so. That includes props, colour palettes and the hands in the shot.

The visual rules matter more here

Our compliance engine checks the rendered image as well as the text, and the visual layer exists for exactly this kind of product. What the caption avoids saying, the picture often says louder.

The general wording rules are in the health claims guide.

Questions

Can I show someone eating a gummy?
Showing consumption is generally fine. What is not fine is a frame that reads as confectionery aimed at people who should not be buying it, and that is a judgement about the whole image rather than about the act.
Can I mention flavour?
Yes. Flavour is a property of the product with no health claim attached, and it is one of the few genuinely differentiating things an edibles brand can talk about.

Keep reading

See this on your own shop

Give us your shop address and we will read it, build a month of content in your brand, and show two finished examples.

Analyse my site